A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity.

408 indexed citations
published 1985
Journal
PubMed

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w62487648 →

Countries where authors are citing A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity..

About A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity.

This paper, published in 1985, received 408 indexed citations . Written by Thomas Stephens, David R. Jacobs and White Cc covering the research area of General Health Professions, Physiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (228 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (210 citations) and General Health Professions (85 citations). Published in PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w62487648.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026