The determinants of planetary health: an Indigenous consensus perspective

148 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2022, received 148 indexed citations. Written by Nicole Redvers, Yuria Celidwen, Clinton Schultz, Cicilia Githaiga, Daniel Kobei, Anne Poelina and Be’sha Blondin covering the research area of General Health Professions, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Nutrition and Dietetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (67 citations), General Health Professions (67 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (42 citations). Published in ResearchOnline@ND (The University of Notre Dame).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w620796 →

Countries where authors are citing The determinants of planetary health: an Indigenous consensus perspective

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The determinants of planetary health: an Indigenous consensus perspective. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The determinants of planetary health: an Indigenous consensus perspective with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The determinants of planetary health: an Indigenous consensus perspective more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The determinants of planetary health: an Indigenous consensus perspective

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The determinants of planetary health: an Indigenous consensus perspective. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The determinants of planetary health: an Indigenous consensus perspective.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w620796.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026