AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition
Impact in
- Ecology 159
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w61892039 →Countries where authors are citing AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition
This map shows the geographic impact of AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition more than expected).
Fields of papers citing AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition
This network shows the impact of AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition.
About AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition
This paper, published in 2013, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Steven Leary, Wendy J. Underwood, Raymond Anthony, Samuel C. Cartner, D. G. Corey, Temple Grandin, Cheryl B. Greenacre, Mary Ann McCrackin, Robert E. Meyer and David L. Miller covering the research area of Genetics and Small Animals. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (161 citations), Ecology (159 citations), Small Animals (152 citations), Genetics (148 citations) and Immunology (101 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w61892039.