Looking for Spinoza : Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain
Impact in
- Authors
- António R. Damásio
- Journal
- Dominican Scholar (Dominican University of California)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4464964 →Countries where authors are citing Looking for Spinoza : Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain
This map shows the geographic impact of Looking for Spinoza : Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Looking for Spinoza : Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Looking for Spinoza : Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Looking for Spinoza : Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain
This network shows the impact of Looking for Spinoza : Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Looking for Spinoza : Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain.
About Looking for Spinoza : Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain
This paper, published in 2003, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by António R. Damásio. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (345 citations), Social Psychology (339 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (192 citations), Sociology and Political Science (162 citations) and Clinical Psychology (130 citations). Published in Dominican Scholar (Dominican University of California).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4464964.