Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6079778 →Countries where authors are citing Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner
This map shows the geographic impact of Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner
This network shows the impact of Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner.
About Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner
This paper, published in 2002, received 631 indexed citations . Written by Åsa Persson, Johan Holmgren and Ulf Söderman covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Geology and Environmental Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Environmental Engineering (617 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (495 citations) and Insect Science (344 citations). Published in Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6079778.