ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w60451346 →Countries where authors are citing ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription
This map shows the geographic impact of ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription more than expected).
Fields of papers citing ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription
This network shows the impact of ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription.
About ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription
This paper, published in 2006, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Barry A. Franklin, M. H. Whaley, Edward T. Howley, Gary Balady and Ira Martin Grais covering the research area of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (374 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (303 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (239 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w60451346.