Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit
Impact in
- Ophthalmology 109
Classified as
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w60167496 →Countries where authors are citing Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit
This map shows the geographic impact of Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit
This network shows the impact of Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit.
About Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit
This paper, published in 1997, received 329 indexed citations . Written by Eugene Wolff, Anthony J. Bron, Ramesh C. Tripathi and Brenda J. Tripathi covering the research area of Anatomy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ophthalmology (109 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (73 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (61 citations), Dermatology (38 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (35 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w60167496.