Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices
Impact in
- Software 297
Classified as
- Authors
- Robert Martin
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w60101502 →Countries where authors are citing Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices
This map shows the geographic impact of Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices
This network shows the impact of Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices.
About Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices
This paper, published in 2002, received 911 indexed citations . Written by Robert Martin covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (632 citations), Software (297 citations), Artificial Intelligence (286 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (201 citations) and Computer Science Applications (112 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w60101502.