Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate
- Authors
- Stephen M. Kosslyn
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w59657646 →Countries where authors are citing Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate
This map shows the geographic impact of Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate
This network shows the impact of Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate.
About Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate
This paper, published in 1994, received 905 indexed citations . Written by Stephen M. Kosslyn covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (494 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (341 citations) and Social Psychology (203 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w59657646.