A Three-Way Model for Collective Learning on Multi-Relational Data

905 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 905 indexed citations. Written by Maximilian Nickel, Volker Tresp and Hans‐Peter Kriegel covering the research area of Computational Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (805 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (182 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (116 citations). Published in International Conference on Machine Learning.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w2972625 →

Countries where authors are citing A Three-Way Model for Collective Learning on Multi-Relational Data

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A Three-Way Model for Collective Learning on Multi-Relational Data. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Three-Way Model for Collective Learning on Multi-Relational Data with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Three-Way Model for Collective Learning on Multi-Relational Data more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A Three-Way Model for Collective Learning on Multi-Relational Data

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A Three-Way Model for Collective Learning on Multi-Relational Data. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Three-Way Model for Collective Learning on Multi-Relational Data.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w2972625.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026