The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation.
- Authors
- Teodoro AyllónNathan H. Azrin
- Journal
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5964076 →Countries where authors are citing The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation.
This map shows the geographic impact of The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation.
This network shows the impact of The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation..
About The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation.
This paper, published in 1968, received 339 indexed citations . Written by Teodoro Ayllón and Nathan H. Azrin. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (237 citations), Clinical Psychology (143 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (137 citations). Published in DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5964076.