Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment
- Authors
- Muzafer Sherif
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w58241383 →Countries where authors are citing Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment
This map shows the geographic impact of Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment
This network shows the impact of Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment.
About Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment
This paper, published in 2013, received 587 indexed citations . Written by Muzafer Sherif covering the research area of Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (400 citations), Social Psychology (196 citations) and Safety Research (82 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w58241383.