Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w58088408 →Countries where authors are citing Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self
This map shows the geographic impact of Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self
This network shows the impact of Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self.
About Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self
This paper, published in 2000, received 700 indexed citations . Written by Catriona Mackenzie and Natalie Stoljar. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (214 citations), Sociology and Political Science (201 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (152 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w58088408.