Catriona Mackenzie

5.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
56 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Catriona Mackenzie is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Catriona Mackenzie has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 13 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 12 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Catriona Mackenzie's work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (9 papers). Catriona Mackenzie is often cited by papers focused on Political Philosophy and Ethics (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (9 papers). Catriona Mackenzie collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Catriona Mackenzie's co-authors include Natalie Stoljar, Wendy Rogers, Susan Dodds, Eileen Pittaway, Christopher McDowell, Robyn Langdon, Kim Atkins, Jackie Leach Scully, Max Coltheart and Paul Formosa and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Women s Studies International Forum and Hypatia.

In The Last Decade

Catriona Mackenzie

54 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self

2000 700 citations Catriona Mackenzie et al. profile →

Peers

Catriona Mackenzie

SPS

GHP

CP

PHEOH

CN

Eva Feder Kittay United States

Emily Martin United States

Thomas J. Csordas United States

Douglas W. Maynard United States

Lynn M. Morgan United States

Dan Goodley United Kingdom

Joseph W. Schneider United States

Margrit Shildrick Sweden

Carol K. Sigelman United States

Melanie Nind United Kingdom

Eva Feder Kittay United States

Catriona Mackenzie

791 ×0.9

SPS

534 ×0.8

GHP

293 ×0.6

CP

177 ×0.4

PHEOH

170 ×0.5

CN

Citations per year, relative to Catriona Mackenzie Catriona Mackenzie (= 1×) peers Eva Feder Kittay

Countries citing papers authored by Catriona Mackenzie

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catriona Mackenzie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catriona Mackenzie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catriona Mackenzie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catriona Mackenzie

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catriona Mackenzie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catriona Mackenzie. The network helps show where Catriona Mackenzie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catriona Mackenzie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catriona Mackenzie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catriona Mackenzie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catriona Mackenzie. Catriona Mackenzie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Mackenzie, Catriona. (2023). Autonomous agency, we‐agency, and social oppression. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 61(2). 373–389. 1 indexed citations

2.

Mackenzie, Catriona, et al.. (2021). The Empathy Dilemma: Democratic Deliberation, Epistemic Injustice and the Problem of Empathetic Imagination. Res Publica. 28(2). 365–389. 4 indexed citations

3.

Mackenzie, Catriona. (2018). Feminist innovation in philosophy: Relational autonomy and social justice. Women s Studies International Forum. 72. 144–151. 42 indexed citations

4.

Mackenzie, Catriona. (2017). Vulnerability, needs and moral obligation. 83–100. 2 indexed citations

5.

Vickers, J. N., et al.. (2015). Expertise differences in quiet eye duration and performance in surgical knot tying.. International journal of sport psychology. 46(6). 528–541. 2 indexed citations

6.

Mackenzie, Catriona, Wendy Rogers, & Susan Dodds. (2014). Introduction: What is Vulnerability and Why Does it Matter for Moral Theory?. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 64 indexed citations

7.

Formosa, Paul & Catriona Mackenzie. (2014). Nussbaum, Kant, and the Capabilities Approach to Dignity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 17(5). 875–892. 37 indexed citations

8.

Dodds, Susan, Wendy Rogers, & Catriona Mackenzie. (2013). Vulnerability. Oxford University Press eBooks. 178 indexed citations

9.

Rogers, Wendy, Catriona Mackenzie, & Susan Dodds. (2012). Why bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. 5(2). 11–38. 169 indexed citations

10.

Langdon, Robyn & Catriona Mackenzie. (2012). Are Intentionality Judgments Fundamentally Moral. 293–312. 1 indexed citations

11.

Mackenzie, Catriona. (2010). Literary statesman without a stateBury me at the marketplace : Es-kia Mphahlele and company - Letters 1943-2006N. Chabani Manganyi & David Attwell (Eds.) : book review. Literator. 31(3). 205–208. 1 indexed citations

12.

Mackenzie, Catriona. (2010). Autonomy: individualistic or social and relational?. 107–127. 7 indexed citations

13.

Mackenzie, Catriona. (2009). Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, ed., Moral Psychology, Volume 3. The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008, pp. xix + 569, US $30 (paperback). Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 87(3). 528–532. 1 indexed citations

14.

Mackenzie, Catriona. (2008). Relational Autonomy, Normative Authority and Perfectionism. Journal of Social Philosophy. 39(4). 512–533. 183 indexed citations

15.

Mackenzie, Catriona. (2007). FEMINIST BIOETHICS AND GENETIC TERMINATION. Bioethics. 21(9). 515–516. 1 indexed citations

16.

Mackenzie, Catriona. (2007). Bare Personhood? Velleman on selfhood. Philosophical Explorations. 10(3). 263–281. 8 indexed citations

17.

Zwi, Anthony B., Natalie J Grove, Catriona Mackenzie, et al.. (2006). Placing ethics in the centre: Negotiating new spaces for ethical research in conflict situations. Global Public Health. 1(3). 264–277. 37 indexed citations

18.

Mackenzie, Catriona. (2003). Autonomy, Gender and Politics. 18 indexed citations

19.

Mackenzie, Catriona. (1992). Abortion and embodiment. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 70(2). 136–155. 42 indexed citations

20.

Mackenzie, Catriona. (1990). Pateman, C.: "The Sexual Contract". Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 68. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact