Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain.
- Authors
- Toshio MoritanideVries Ha
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w58080563 →Countries where authors are citing Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain.
This map shows the geographic impact of Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain.
This network shows the impact of Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain..
About Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain.
This paper, published in 1979, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Toshio Moritani and deVries Ha covering the research area of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (642 citations), Biomedical Engineering (504 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (167 citations), Physiology (139 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (118 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w58080563.