Collagen remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat heart.
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w57890890 →Countries where authors are citing Collagen remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat heart.
This map shows the geographic impact of Collagen remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat heart.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Collagen remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat heart. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Collagen remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat heart. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Collagen remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat heart.
This network shows the impact of Collagen remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat heart.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Collagen remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat heart..
About Collagen remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat heart.
This paper, published in 1995, received 484 indexed citations . Written by Jack P.M. Cleutjens, M. J. Verluyten and Mat J.A.P. Daemen covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (320 citations), Molecular Biology (139 citations), Surgery (118 citations), Oncology (70 citations) and Cancer Research (59 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w57890890.