Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues
- Authors
- Ross Vasta
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w56868556 →Countries where authors are citing Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues
This map shows the geographic impact of Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues
This network shows the impact of Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues.
About Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues
This paper, published in 1992, received 625 indexed citations . Written by Ross Vasta. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (261 citations), Education (218 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (139 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w56868556.