Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w56843317 →Countries where authors are citing Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).
This map shows the geographic impact of Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).
This network shows the impact of Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)..
About Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).
This paper, published in 2001, received 551 indexed citations . Written by David E. Nelson, Deborah Holtzman, Julie Bolen and Karin A. Mack. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (178 citations), General Health Professions (156 citations) and Physiology (128 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w56843317.