Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis.

758 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1958, received 758 indexed citations. Written by Ben Eiseman and William Silen covering the research area of Endocrinology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Psychiatry and Mental health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Infectious Diseases (589 citations), Molecular Biology (445 citations) and Gastroenterology (313 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w56728380 →

Countries where authors are citing Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w56728380.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026