Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w55685301 →Countries where authors are citing Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments
This map shows the geographic impact of Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments
This network shows the impact of Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments.
About Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments
This paper, published in 1986, received 620 indexed citations . Written by Thomas Ε. Lovejoy, Richard O. Bierregaard, Anthony B. Rylands, Jay R. Malcolm, Katrina Brown, George Powell and Herbert O. R. Schubart covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (373 citations), Ecology (311 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (204 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w55685301.