Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.
Impact in
- Authors
- A. H. BlackWilliam F. Prokasy
- Journal
- Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5521491 →Countries where authors are citing Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.
This map shows the geographic impact of Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.
This network shows the impact of Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory..
About Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.
This paper, published in 1972, received 3.6k indexed citations . Written by A. H. Black and William F. Prokasy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (2.4k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (983 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (955 citations), Social Psychology (598 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (439 citations). Published in Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5521491.