In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects

332 indexed citations
published 2010
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w54975908 →

Countries where authors are citing In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects more than expected).

Fields of papers citing In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects.

About In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects

This paper, published in 2010, received 332 indexed citations . Written by Bjørnar Olsen covering the research area of Space and Planetary Science and Archeology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Anthropology (140 citations), Paleontology (103 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (92 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w54975908.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026