Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data analysis : concepts and applications
- Authors
- Johan GabrielssonDaniel Weiner
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w54790983 →Countries where authors are citing Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data analysis : concepts and applications
This map shows the geographic impact of Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data analysis : concepts and applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data analysis : concepts and applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data analysis : concepts and applications more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data analysis : concepts and applications
This network shows the impact of Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data analysis : concepts and applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data analysis : concepts and applications.
About Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data analysis : concepts and applications
This paper, published in 2002, received 539 indexed citations . Written by Johan Gabrielsson and Daniel Weiner covering the research area of Analytical Chemistry and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (130 citations), Pharmacology (95 citations) and Oncology (85 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w54790983.