National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2011-2014.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w54722617 →Countries where authors are citing National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2011-2014.
This map shows the geographic impact of National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2011-2014.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2011-2014. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2011-2014. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2011-2014.
This network shows the impact of National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2011-2014.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2011-2014..
About National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2011-2014.
This paper, published in 2014, received 913 indexed citations . Written by Clifford L. Johnson, Sylvia Dohrmann, Vicki L. Burt and Leyla Mohadjer covering the research area of General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (294 citations), Physiology (192 citations) and Epidemiology (142 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w54722617.