Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives

667 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2006, received 667 indexed citations. Written by W. Richard Scott and Gerald F. Davis covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (201 citations), Sociology and Political Science (177 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (176 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w54461046 →

Countries where authors are citing Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w54461046.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026