Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change

2.4k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1976, received 2.4k indexed citations. Written by David H. Barlow, Matthew K. Nock and Michel Hersen covering the research area of Developmental and Educational Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.2k citations), Clinical Psychology (824 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (770 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w54449190 →

Countries where authors are citing Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w54449190.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026