Community Development:Alternatif Pengembangan Masyarakat di Era Globalisasi
- Authors
- Jim IfeFrank Tesoriero
- Journal
- Andalas University Repository (Andalas University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w54383058 →Countries where authors are citing Community Development:Alternatif Pengembangan Masyarakat di Era Globalisasi
This map shows the geographic impact of Community Development:Alternatif Pengembangan Masyarakat di Era Globalisasi. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Community Development:Alternatif Pengembangan Masyarakat di Era Globalisasi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Community Development:Alternatif Pengembangan Masyarakat di Era Globalisasi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Community Development:Alternatif Pengembangan Masyarakat di Era Globalisasi
This network shows the impact of Community Development:Alternatif Pengembangan Masyarakat di Era Globalisasi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Community Development:Alternatif Pengembangan Masyarakat di Era Globalisasi.
About Community Development:Alternatif Pengembangan Masyarakat di Era Globalisasi
This paper, published in 2016, received 153 indexed citations . Written by Jim Ife and Frank Tesoriero covering the research area of Education, Demography and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Demography (77 citations), Sociology and Political Science (58 citations) and Education (35 citations). Published in Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w54383058.