The Chimpanzees of the Tai Forest : Behavioural Ecology and Evolution
- Journal
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w54231939 →Countries where authors are citing The Chimpanzees of the Tai Forest : Behavioural Ecology and Evolution
This map shows the geographic impact of The Chimpanzees of the Tai Forest : Behavioural Ecology and Evolution. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Chimpanzees of the Tai Forest : Behavioural Ecology and Evolution with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Chimpanzees of the Tai Forest : Behavioural Ecology and Evolution more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Chimpanzees of the Tai Forest : Behavioural Ecology and Evolution
This network shows the impact of The Chimpanzees of the Tai Forest : Behavioural Ecology and Evolution. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Chimpanzees of the Tai Forest : Behavioural Ecology and Evolution.
About The Chimpanzees of the Tai Forest : Behavioural Ecology and Evolution
This paper, published in 2000, received 514 indexed citations . Written by Christophe Boesch and Hedwige Boesch‐Achermann covering the research area of Genetics and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (432 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (192 citations) and Developmental Biology (188 citations). Published in Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w54231939.