Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture

676 indexed citations
published 2001
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w54016366 →

Countries where authors are citing Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture.

About Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture

This paper, published in 2001, received 676 indexed citations . Written by Marita Sturken and Lisa Cartwright covering the research area of Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History and Urban Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (219 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (213 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (95 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w54016366.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026