Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005: WHO global database on anaemia.
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w53727559 →Countries where authors are citing Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005: WHO global database on anaemia.
This map shows the geographic impact of Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005: WHO global database on anaemia.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005: WHO global database on anaemia. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005: WHO global database on anaemia. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005: WHO global database on anaemia.
This network shows the impact of Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005: WHO global database on anaemia.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005: WHO global database on anaemia..
About Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005: WHO global database on anaemia.
This paper, published in 2008, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Bruno de Benoist, Erin McLean and Mary E. Cogswell. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Hematology (635 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (506 citations) and Genetics (288 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w53727559.