Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w53448954 →Countries where authors are citing Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital.
This map shows the geographic impact of Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital.
This network shows the impact of Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital..
About Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital.
This paper, published in 2004, received 606 indexed citations . Written by Alan J. Forster, Heather D. Clark, A. Ménard, Natasha Chandok, Asmat Ullah Khan and Carl van Walraven covering the research area of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Pharmacy and Emergency Medical Services. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geriatrics and Gerontology (257 citations), Emergency Medical Services (224 citations) and Emergency Medicine (189 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w53448954.