User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View

1.9k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2003, received 1.9k indexed citations. Written by Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis and Fred D. Davis covering the research area of Information Systems and Management, Communication and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems and Management (992 citations), Sociology and Political Science (556 citations) and Information Systems (287 citations). Published in Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w5261877 →

Countries where authors are citing User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View more than expected).

Fields of papers citing User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w5261877.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026