Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: With Applications to Statistics

1.2k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1996, received 1.2k indexed citations. Written by Jon A. Wellner covering the research area of Applied Mathematics and Statistics and Probability. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics and Probability (875 citations), Artificial Intelligence (368 citations) and Finance (212 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w52204622 →

Countries where authors are citing Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: With Applications to Statistics

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: With Applications to Statistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: With Applications to Statistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: With Applications to Statistics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: With Applications to Statistics

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: With Applications to Statistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: With Applications to Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w52204622.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026