Motivation and Second Language Acquisition: The Socio-Educational Model

267 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2010, received 267 indexed citations. Written by R. C. Gardner covering the research area of Language and Linguistics and Literature and Literary Theory. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (180 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (130 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (81 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w51901850 →

Countries where authors are citing Motivation and Second Language Acquisition: The Socio-Educational Model

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Motivation and Second Language Acquisition: The Socio-Educational Model. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Motivation and Second Language Acquisition: The Socio-Educational Model with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Motivation and Second Language Acquisition: The Socio-Educational Model more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Motivation and Second Language Acquisition: The Socio-Educational Model

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Motivation and Second Language Acquisition: The Socio-Educational Model. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Motivation and Second Language Acquisition: The Socio-Educational Model.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w51901850.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026