Bupropion: a review of its mechanism of antidepressant activity.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w51682364 →Countries where authors are citing Bupropion: a review of its mechanism of antidepressant activity.
This map shows the geographic impact of Bupropion: a review of its mechanism of antidepressant activity.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bupropion: a review of its mechanism of antidepressant activity. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bupropion: a review of its mechanism of antidepressant activity. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Bupropion: a review of its mechanism of antidepressant activity.
This network shows the impact of Bupropion: a review of its mechanism of antidepressant activity.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Bupropion: a review of its mechanism of antidepressant activity..
About Bupropion: a review of its mechanism of antidepressant activity.
This paper, published in 1995, received 561 indexed citations . Written by John A. Ascher, Jonathan Cole, J. N. Colin, John P. Feighner, R M Ferris, H.C. Fibiger, Robert N. Golden, Peter Martin, W.Z. Potter and Elliott Richelson covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Psychiatry and Mental health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (185 citations), Physiology (182 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (175 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w51682364.