ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF DEFICIENCY IN POPULATIONS AND OPTIONS FOR ITS CONTROL

547 indexed citations
published 2004

Countries where authors are citing ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF DEFICIENCY IN POPULATIONS AND OPTIONS FOR ITS CONTROL

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF DEFICIENCY IN POPULATIONS AND OPTIONS FOR ITS CONTROL. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF DEFICIENCY IN POPULATIONS AND OPTIONS FOR ITS CONTROL with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF DEFICIENCY IN POPULATIONS AND OPTIONS FOR ITS CONTROL more than expected).

Fields of papers citing ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF DEFICIENCY IN POPULATIONS AND OPTIONS FOR ITS CONTROL

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF DEFICIENCY IN POPULATIONS AND OPTIONS FOR ITS CONTROL. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF DEFICIENCY IN POPULATIONS AND OPTIONS FOR ITS CONTROL.

About ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF DEFICIENCY IN POPULATIONS AND OPTIONS FOR ITS CONTROL

This paper, published in 2004, received 547 indexed citations . Written by Christine Hotz and Kevin M. Brown covering the research area of Plant Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Hematology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nutrition and Dietetics (313 citations), Plant Science (300 citations) and Soil Science (135 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w48748549.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026