Theory and practice of error control codes

1.3k indexed citations
published 1983
Journal
Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w48525173 →

Countries where authors are citing Theory and practice of error control codes

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Theory and practice of error control codes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theory and practice of error control codes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory and practice of error control codes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Theory and practice of error control codes

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Theory and practice of error control codes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Theory and practice of error control codes.

About Theory and practice of error control codes

This paper, published in 1983, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Richard E. Blahut covering the research area of Software, Hardware and Architecture and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (739 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (701 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (682 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (261 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (156 citations). Published in Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w48525173.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026