Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w47033564 →Countries where authors are citing Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe
This map shows the geographic impact of Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe
This network shows the impact of Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe.
About Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe
This paper, published in 2005, received 539 indexed citations . Written by Ruud Koopmans, Paul Statham, Marco Giugni and Florence Passy covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (444 citations), Political Science and International Relations (268 citations), Demography (107 citations), Education (56 citations) and Communication (41 citations). Published in Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w47033564.