Gender differences in emotional intelligence: The mediating effect of age.

147 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 147 indexed citations. Written by Pablo Fernández‐Berrocal, Rosario Cabello, Ruth Castillo and Natalio Extremera covering the research area of Education, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (112 citations), Clinical Psychology (45 citations) and Education (39 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w46945668 →

Countries where authors are citing Gender differences in emotional intelligence: The mediating effect of age.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gender differences in emotional intelligence: The mediating effect of age.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gender differences in emotional intelligence: The mediating effect of age. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gender differences in emotional intelligence: The mediating effect of age. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Gender differences in emotional intelligence: The mediating effect of age.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Gender differences in emotional intelligence: The mediating effect of age.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gender differences in emotional intelligence: The mediating effect of age..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w46945668.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026