Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment.

630 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1996, received 630 indexed citations. Written by Charles A. O’Reilly and Jennifer A. Chatman covering the research area of Anthropology, Demography and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (263 citations), Strategy and Management (205 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (115 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w45378682 →

Countries where authors are citing Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w45378682.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026