BIO2010 : Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists

728 indexed citations
published 2003

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w45359196 →

Countries where authors are citing BIO2010 : Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of BIO2010 : Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by BIO2010 : Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BIO2010 : Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists more than expected).

Fields of papers citing BIO2010 : Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of BIO2010 : Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the BIO2010 : Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists.

About BIO2010 : Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists

This paper, published in 2003, received 728 indexed citations . Written by Division on Earth covering the research area of Information Systems and Management, Biomedical Engineering and Architecture. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (365 citations), Molecular Biology (253 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (168 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w45359196.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026