Archaeological Theory Today
Impact in
- Anthropology 174
- Paleontology 138
Classified as
- Authors
- Ian Hodder
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w45349711 →Countries where authors are citing Archaeological Theory Today
This map shows the geographic impact of Archaeological Theory Today. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Archaeological Theory Today with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archaeological Theory Today more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Archaeological Theory Today
This network shows the impact of Archaeological Theory Today. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Archaeological Theory Today.
About Archaeological Theory Today
This paper, published in 2012, received 343 indexed citations . Written by Ian Hodder covering the research area of Paleontology, Anthropology and Space and Planetary Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Anthropology (174 citations), Paleontology (138 citations), Archeology (90 citations), Archeology (58 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (56 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w45349711.