Investment, Capacity Utilization and the Real Business Cycle
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Jeremy GreenwoodZvi Hercowitz
- Journal
- American Economic Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4516066 →Countries where authors are citing Investment, Capacity Utilization and the Real Business Cycle
This map shows the geographic impact of Investment, Capacity Utilization and the Real Business Cycle. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Investment, Capacity Utilization and the Real Business Cycle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Investment, Capacity Utilization and the Real Business Cycle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Investment, Capacity Utilization and the Real Business Cycle
This network shows the impact of Investment, Capacity Utilization and the Real Business Cycle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Investment, Capacity Utilization and the Real Business Cycle.
About Investment, Capacity Utilization and the Real Business Cycle
This paper, published in 1986, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Jeremy Greenwood and Zvi Hercowitz covering the research area of General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (1.1k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (903 citations), Finance (390 citations), Accounting (133 citations) and Gender Studies (46 citations). Published in American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4516066.