Estado compensador y nuevos extractivismos. Las ambivalencias del progresismo sudamericano
- Authors
- Eduardo Gudynas
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w44130371 →Countries where authors are citing Estado compensador y nuevos extractivismos. Las ambivalencias del progresismo sudamericano
This map shows the geographic impact of Estado compensador y nuevos extractivismos. Las ambivalencias del progresismo sudamericano. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Estado compensador y nuevos extractivismos. Las ambivalencias del progresismo sudamericano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estado compensador y nuevos extractivismos. Las ambivalencias del progresismo sudamericano more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Estado compensador y nuevos extractivismos. Las ambivalencias del progresismo sudamericano
This network shows the impact of Estado compensador y nuevos extractivismos. Las ambivalencias del progresismo sudamericano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Estado compensador y nuevos extractivismos. Las ambivalencias del progresismo sudamericano.
About Estado compensador y nuevos extractivismos. Las ambivalencias del progresismo sudamericano
This paper, published in 2012, received 144 indexed citations . Written by Eduardo Gudynas covering the research area of Demography and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Building and Construction (49 citations), Sociology and Political Science (45 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (42 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w44130371.