Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w43754743 →Countries where authors are citing Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.
This map shows the geographic impact of Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.
This network shows the impact of Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms..
About Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.
This paper, published in 1980, received 6.5k indexed citations . Written by David Botstein, R. White, Mark H. Skolnick and Ronald W. Davis covering the research area of Genetics and Rheumatology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (3.6k citations), Plant Science (2.6k citations) and Molecular Biology (2.3k citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w43754743.