Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion : a state of knowledge review

380 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1990, received 380 indexed citations. Written by L.A. Bruijnzeel covering the research area of Forestry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (212 citations), Water Science and Technology (204 citations) and Soil Science (131 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w43281817 →

Countries where authors are citing Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion : a state of knowledge review

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion : a state of knowledge review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion : a state of knowledge review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion : a state of knowledge review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion : a state of knowledge review

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion : a state of knowledge review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion : a state of knowledge review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w43281817.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026