Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure".
- Authors
- Miller Bh
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w43245455 →Countries where authors are citing Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure".
This map shows the geographic impact of Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure".. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure". with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure". more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure".
This network shows the impact of Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure".. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure"..
About Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure".
This paper, published in 1970, received 816 indexed citations . Written by Miller Bh covering the research area of Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (751 citations), Neurology (605 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (340 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w43245455.