Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w42725617 →Countries where authors are citing Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective
This map shows the geographic impact of Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective
This network shows the impact of Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective.
About Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective
This paper, published in 1995, received 488 indexed citations . Written by Pamela J. Shoemaker and Stephen D. Reese covering the research area of Communication and Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Communication (376 citations), Sociology and Political Science (242 citations) and Gender Studies (50 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w42725617.