Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-being?
- Authors
- Gordon WaddellKim Burton
- Journal
- University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w41869200 →Countries where authors are citing Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-being?
This map shows the geographic impact of Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-being?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-being? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-being? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-being?
This network shows the impact of Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-being?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-being?.
About Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-being?
This paper, published in 2006, received 599 indexed citations . Written by Gordon Waddell and Kim Burton covering the research area of General Health Professions and Demography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (417 citations), Pharmacology (166 citations) and Demography (99 citations). Published in University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w41869200.