Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11 baski: 1999-2018)
- Authors
- Ali YıldırımHasan Şimşek
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w40934649 →Countries where authors are citing Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11 baski: 1999-2018)
This map shows the geographic impact of Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11 baski: 1999-2018). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11 baski: 1999-2018) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11 baski: 1999-2018) more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11 baski: 1999-2018)
This network shows the impact of Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11 baski: 1999-2018). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11 baski: 1999-2018).
About Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11 baski: 1999-2018)
This paper, published in 1999, received 787 indexed citations . Written by Ali Yıldırım and Hasan Şimşek covering the research area of Philosophy and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (531 citations), Philosophy (361 citations), Sociology and Political Science (184 citations), Social Psychology (74 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (63 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w40934649.